Dr Mahathir in their own blog Posts said: "Now we hear it was suggested that countries in the writing of history must take into account the sensitivity of all races. The problem is, the sensitivity can deny the historical truth? "
Happened is happened. even if it has become history, or began to be forgotten.
But history can not be rewritten because of certain factors, or denied.
The truth of history is a valuable textbook, history is our all history.
We should have the right to know and understand the truth.
And not know something is "piracy" of history.
Some of our leaders fear of their own future affected,so their choice act like ostrich to avoid the truth.
Some people also believe that as a selective history.
The new generation will only know that "piracy " of history.
<<Interlock>> write is the truth.
Certain words, the original really is used to refer to a specific ethnic group.
This is what has happened. can not change.
Why do some people call this fact as a kind of racial discrimination?
Why not learn to understand why this happen?
Do you think, because it is painful, we do not go to understand and know?
This principle would only repeat the complex ethnic withdrawal, has been experiencing the same event.
马哈迪在本身的部落格贴文说：“现在我们听到有人建议在撰写国家历史时必须顾及所有种族的敏感。问题是，敏感度就可否定历史真相？”
事情发生了就是发生了.就算它已经成为历史,还是开始被人遗忘.
但历史却对不可因为某些因素而被改写还是抹杀.
历史的真相是个珍贵的教科书,而却历史是属于大家.
大家应该有权利知道历史的真相.
而不是知道一些被"盗版"的历史.
我们的一些领袖因为担心自己的前途受影响,而选择鸵鸟似的回避历史的真相.
一些人民也一样选择性的相信历史.
而新一代更只会知道"盗版"的历史.
<< Interlock >> 写的都是真相.
一些特定的字眼,当初真的是用来称呼特定的族群.
这都是发生过的事情.改不了.
为什么一些人把这事实看作是种族歧视的一种?
为什么不从中去了解为什么会发生这样的情况?
难道就因为这是痛苦的事情,我们就不该去了解和知道?
这样的原则只会让族群重蹈复撤,一直经历相同的事件.
Comments
Post a Comment